By Roy F. Baumeister and Sara R. Wotman.
(Yes, this review is...kinda weird. Sorry, but it's hard to read this book and not go to the personal.)
This is a fascinating and much-needed book, in my opinion, studying both the feelings of rejected lovers and the people who reject them. The authors asked the study participants to write about both when they loved someone that did not return their feelings, and when they didn't love someone who loved them, so you get both perspectives on their behavior.
On the wannabe lovers side: our culture encourages crazy blind pursuit of love, doing anything you can to get it (just watch any movie), and not acknowledging a no unless they really really have to. There's no ethics in love, you do what you have to do. The wannabe lovers also pretty much had no sense or reason and constantly saw "positive" signs no matter what the rejector did. And stalking and crazy behavior constantly happened. And yet, they have a possibility of reward (the rejectors don't), so they keep pursuing, and some don't feel too bad about having "loved and lost" anyway. It's more of a happy gamble from their perspective, even with the unhappy ending.
On the rejectors side: our culture finds it pretty awful to turn down an offer of love, and there is no movie script to tell someone how to turn someone down. We don't know how to do it at all. It's kind of going against humanity to reject love, and you are not supposed to do it. We feel obligated to love them back, and feel awful that we can't. The only emotional benefit they get is a brief feeling of being flattered (if the suitor isn't someone the rejector can't stand, which instead makes it not flattering in the slightest), which is quickly drowned out by the awfulness that follows. There is no way to reject someone without being forced into a villain role. Rejectors have an extremely hard time turning someone down because it requires them to be mean. Stringing them along, subtle hints of non-interest, real or made up significant others, and caving in to dating don't help. The nicer you are at trying to reject someone, the more the suitor will decide that it's a sign of hope. Even if you are brutally mean to the person, it doesn't dissuade a lot of people from still pursuing and stalking you. In the end, the rejectors end up hating the pursuer. Rejectors have no good options and no possibility of a happy or even non-miserable outcome. Plus if it gets really fun, you end up in fear of your life. Joy.
"He did nothing wrong and was fundamentally innocent, yet was led into feeling guilty and bad, and from this sense of obligation and wrongfulness he acted in ways that made things worse."
I will freely admit to a lot of bias during this review because I have
had godawful experiences of being the rejector (to the point that when I have liked someone for whom it was obviously not mutual, I've taken great care to NOT let them know I like them so I don't inflict this shit on someone else), and I really liked that
this book looked at things from that perspective, and acknowledges that
it's nothing but horrible to have to turn someone down. Though the one
flaw of the book in my opinion is that for all of the authors' bemoaning
about the ethics of rejection and how we don't have a "script" in our
culture for rejecting someone...they didn't try to come up with one
themselves? It seems pretty obvious to me that even if they're trying to
be neutral and scientific, they've pretty much figured out how it
works.
So, here is how a rejector's script should go--and let me tell you, this is the most OPTIMAL one possible:
1. The second you get asked out, you must refuse them immediately. Do not be nice, do not be kind, do not cite a good excuse for not going, do not ignore the situation. You must immediately tell them that you loathe them, can't stand them, think they are ugly and stupid and smell bad, and make them feel as awful as you possibly can.
Why do I say this? Because no matter what you do or how nice you try to be, the entire situation is going to boil down to you being the villain that breaks someone's heart. The nicer you are, the more they will take it as a sign of hope. You have to be mean from minute one and let them know as best you can that you cannot stand them and there is no hope whatsoever, or at least there shouldn't be. No matter what, you are going to have to be a horrible person to them at some point, period. So you might as well start ASAP rather than trying to not be awful. Eventually (if you are lucky) they will find you to be a horrible human being for not loving them back anyway, so...might as well roll with it.
2. After lowering the bomb on this person, avoid them for the rest of your life. If they were a friend of yours, they are no longer. (Friendships end the second someone wants sex anyway.) AVOID THEM LIKE THE PLAGUE, as best you can. If you work with them, get another job. If they are in your favorite organization, drop out of it. AVOID AVOID AVOID. I can't stress this enough.
Why do I say this? Because wannabe lovers are crazy and ANYTHING YOU DO gives them hope. The fact that you are existing and breathing the same air as them gives them hope. The fact that you didn't spit on them when you walked into the room gives them hope. They are primed to look at anything you do as meaning that you love them, and the more you are around them, the more THEY feel like you are leading them on. You can't do this.
3. Maybe they will get over it if you do #1 and #2, but odds are pretty high that even then, you will probably STILL get stalked anyway.
Ugh. I hate humanity's mating drive.
Four and a half stars.