

Best Internet Variety Show (and Good Luck Getting Anything Done, Ever) in 2005! 


"We already added a little rhyme from my childhood that I taught her a while back to say when people eyeball her in public, so her device will now say "Stare stare, booger bear. Take a picture, I don't care." (When she's old enough, perhaps she'll replace it with "What are you looking at, assmonkey?") At lunch yesterday (at a Mexican restaurant, naturally), she asked me to add "Beans, beans, the magical fruit. The more you eat, the more you toot." Clearly, I am a fine, fine influence on my child. Her teachers are going to be so proud."
"What have comic books and movies told us about Batman's physical abilities?
There's a quote from Neal Adams, the great Batman illustrator, who said
Batman would win place or show in every event in the Olympics. Probably
if I were Batman's handler, I'd put him in the decathlon.
Although Batman is shown in the comics as being the fastest and the
strongest and all these other things, in reality you can't actually be
all of that at once. To be Batman properly, what you really need to do
is be exceptionally good at many different things. It's when you take
all the pieces and put them together that you get the Batman.
What's most plausible about portrayals of Batman's skills?
You could train somebody to be a tremendous athlete and to have a
significant martial arts background, and also to use some of the gear
that he has, which requires a lot of physical prowess. Most of what you
see there is feasible to the extent that somebody could be trained to
that extreme. We're seeing that kind of thing in less than a month in
the Olympics.
What's less realistic?
A
great example is in the movies where Batman is fighting multiple
opponents and all of a sudden he's taking on 10 people. If you just
estimate how fast somebody could punch
and kick, and how many times you could hit one person in a second, you
wind up with numbers like five or six. This doesn't mean you could
fight four or five people. But it's also hard for four or five people
to simultaneously attack somebody, because they get in each other's
way. More realistic is a couple of attackers.
How long would Bruce Wayne have to train to become Batman?
In some of the timelines you see in the comics, the backstory is he
goes away for five years—some it's three to five years, or eight years,
or 12 years. In terms of the physical changes (strength
and conditioning), that's happening fairly quickly. We're talking three
to five years. In terms of the physical skills to be able to defend
himself against all these opponents all the time, I would benchmark
that at 10 to 12 years. Probably the most reality-based representation
of Batman and his training was in Batman Begins.
How would all those beat-downs have affected his longevity?
Keeping in mind that being Batman means never losing:
If you look at consecutive events where professional fighters have to
defend their titles—Muhammad Ali, George Foreman, Ultimate Fighters—the
longest period you're going to find is about two to three years. That
dovetails nicely with the average career for NFL running backs. It's
about three years. (That's the statistic I got from the NFL Players
Association Web site.)
The point is, it's not very long. It's really hard to become Batman in
the first place, and it's hard to maintain it when you get there."
Don't say I didn't warn you. Also talks about male contraception.
Weeks ago, Gene posted this: (All links Washington Post)
"This afternoon, for a column, I am going to do something highly
unusual. Your job is to guess what it is.
Here are your hints:
1. It’s going to be fun for me.
2. It’s kind of naughty, but in a way The Post has authorized.
3. It’s a legitimate, interesting, reasonable idea for a humor column.
4. My ego is a little bit wrapped up in the results.
5. The results might be such that I cannot write about this at all."
"Driving sober, I did swell. Then I drank a third of a bottle of the
pinot -- I would describe it as "impetuously insouciant" -- and tried
again. How'd I do, professor?
"You drove at higher speed, but showed better handling of the car and held the lane well. There were no incidents."
You betchum! This was easy. So I drained the pinot in the next five
minutes -- I'd describe it as "extremely red" -- and sauntered back
into the Buick. At this point, according to the regulations in most
states, I was a DUI waiting to happen.
Inside the car, things were going good. Goodly. The only thing I
noticed was that I seemed to be humming a tune, "In the Year 2525,"
which was annoying, but nothing like guys puking out the window. I did
great. Right, doc?
"You ran a red light and almost hit a pedestrian."
Okay, sure. But otherwise . . .
"You managed to keep the car in lane, but there were many deviations
from the center line. You drove much faster. There were no crashes."
Doc said it himself! No crashes! I drank half of the second bottle,
which I would describe as "definitely wet," then strode manfully into
the car. For some reason, I don't remember all that much of the last
two sessions except that, when I got out, I felt I hadn't done all that
badly. Considering. I did have to close one eye to see that Prof.
Eskandarian had only one head.
"You ran off the road after a curve. You crashed into a bus. You
killed a pedestrian. You had a frontal collision with a car driving in
the opposite direction in the other lane. You killed a bicyclist. As
the test ended, you were beginning a dangerous maneuver that might have
caused a rollover if it had continued."
Now I know what you are thinking. You are thinking that when
completely zitfaced, I was a dangerous driver. But that's not what I
was thinking. I felt I had performed pretty well, but that the machine
had malfunctioned, registering errors where there were none. I remember
writing these indignant impressions right into my notebook, which I am
looking at right now.
It says, quite distinctly: "Lat plobey col pobber, ferl engs."
"There is a story behind this column. It's about the process of big time
journalism. When I first proposed the idea to Tom the Butcher, he was
very concerned about one possible result: What if I continued to ace
the test, well into staggering drunkitude?
"Well," I said, "I can make that funny."
"I'm sure you can," he said, "but I will not publish it."
Sarah Addison Allen: The Sugar Queen
Reviewed July 18. (****)
Julie Kenner: Deja Demon: The Days and Nights of a Demon-Hunting Soccer Mom
Reviewed July 14. (***)
Loretta Chase: Your Scandalous Ways (Avon Historical Romance)
Reviewed July 14. (****)
James A. Hetley: Dragon's Teeth (Ace Fantasy Book)
Reviewed July 14. (***)
Loretta Chase: Not Quite A Lady
Reviewed July 9. (***)
Diana Peterfreund: Rites of Spring (Break)
Reviewed July 7. (***)
John C. Wright: Orphans of Chaos
Reviewed July 5. (****)
Julia Quinn: The Lost Duke of Wyndham (Two Dukes of Wyndham, Book 1)
Reviewed June 28. (***)
David Sedaris: When You Are Engulfed in Flames
Reviewed July 5. (***)
Julia Quinn: It's In His Kiss
Reviewed June 25. (****)
Julia Quinn: When He Was Wicked (Bridgerton Family Series)
Reviewed June 24. (***)
Terry Pratchett: Making Money (Discworld)
Reviewed June 18. (****)
PC Cast: Chosen (House of Night, Book 3)
Reviewed July 14. (****)
PC Cast: Betrayed (House of Night, Book 2)
Reviewed July 9. (****)
PC Cast: Marked (House of Night, Book 1)
Reviewed July 7. (****)
Jacqueline Carey: Kushiel's Mercy (Kushiel's Legacy)
Reviewed June 23. (*****)
Joy Davidson: The Psychology of Joss Whedon: An Unauthorized Exploration of Buffy, Angel, and Firefly (Psychology of Popular Culture series)
Reviewed June 18. (***)
Rachel Caine: The Dead Girls' Dance (The Morganville Vampires, Book 2)
Reviewed June 17. (**)
Julia Quinn: To Sir Phillip, With Love (Bridgerton Series, Book 5)
Reviewed June 16. (***)
Liane Moriarty: Three Wishes
Reviewed June 16. (***)
Mindy Klasky: Sorcery And The Single Girl (Red Dress Ink)
Reviewed June 16. (**)
Mindy Klasky: Girl's Guide To Witchcraft (Red Dress Ink)
Reviewed June 16. (***)
Danielle Wood: Rosie Little's Cautionary Tales for Girls
Reviewed June 16. (***)
Mary Kay Andrews: Hissy Fit: A Novel
Reviewed June 16. (**)
Julia Quinn: Romancing Mister Bridgerton (Bridgerton Series, Book 4)
Reviewed June 5. (****)
Susan Elizabeth Phillips: Natural Born Charmer
Reviewed June 4. (****)
Toni McGee Causey: Bobbie Faye's (kinda, sorta, not exactly) Family Jewels
Reviewed June 4. (*****)
Ally Carter: Learning to Play Gin
Reviewed January 12. (***)