Lily Wilder is a country girl who lost her family ranch and now gives dude tours a la City Slickers. Years ago she had a big romance with New Yorker Leo, but he went back home for a family medical issue and never contacted her again, and she's still cheesed off about it. Imagine her feelings when he turns up on one of her dude ranch tours, with a group of mostly-asshole-y dudes he knows. (Leo did not know where they were going, I'll point out.) Things take a drastic turn when one of the party goes rogue asshole, gets himself dead, and it turns out this was all a ruse to look for the supposed lost treasure Lily's dead dad Duke hid somewhere. While looking for the treasure, Lily and Leo get back together, if they survive....
Pretty simple, really. I'm not finding much to say about? Romance was all right, treasure hunting is fun, albeit the shady individuals in the book made it uncomfortable. I liked how Leo is a code/math guy and how that worked. Once we find it out it was more or less a Big Mis as to why Leo disappeared on Lily, there's not a whole lot of conflict on them getting back together. It also seemed really easy-peasy as to how the good characters don't end up oh, possibly prosecuted for accidental murder or anything. Mostly just kind of fun fluff read?
Three stars. It was fine, but not that memorable for me somehow, even if treasure hunts are fun.
This is a good point.
Ratings systems and their issues.
So, for the record, this is what my star ratings mean:
5 stars = FREAKING EPIC, gigantic story, everything works well, my mind is blown that a human being thought this up.
4 stars = love this book, it's just not as humongous in scope as a 5. But it's totally awesome and everyone should read it, it's a keeper.
3 stars = mixed feelings (this is where the "I think others might like it, it's just not for me" reviews are likely to go). Not that bad, but has some issues, or it's an okay story but nothing really stands out to me as being memorable. It was a pleasant enough read for a few days, but I'll probably just end up giving the book away rather than rereading it again.
2 stars = generally pretty terrible, but not 100% so. There was at least one thing in this book that made it not totally horrible. This book isn't really recommended to all and sundry, but you might get some value out of the one thing if you try.
1 star (rarely seen here): It's a wallbanger. Nothing is redeemable about this book, it's utter crap, and I probably only finished reading it so I could do an awesome bitchrant about it and I can't justify doing that to books I didn't finish.
The More You Know!(TM)
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 09:26 AM in Non-Review Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0)