Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Get out and push... | Main | That's just crappy. »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Umm ... isn't it a little sexist to say that a woman who acts if she wants to get laid is a skank?
If a gay man did the same position, what would you call him? Let me know so I can tell I friends what you'd call them.
Posted by: Scott Anderson | May 20, 2007 at 08:58 AM
While I don't like the word skank. period. I will say there is a very big difference between saying "ooh! fuck me you big boy!" and "wanna get each other off?"
Somehow, in translating the original artwork into 3-d art, they went from the latter sentiment to the former.
So, while I disapprove of skank as an insult for other reasons, I will say it's a fairly accurate term for the MJ statue. I don't think it's use here is a condemnation of women who want to get laid, either. I also can't really see anyone seeing it as such - unless they are confused about the difference between "please masturbate in me!" and "let's have fun together!"
Posted by: Mickle | May 20, 2007 at 03:50 PM